Blog Archives

Day 698

12/25/2018

Holiday edition
AT CHRISTMAS, CELEBRATING HOW THE NATION - AND ITS KIDS - DEFENDED DEMOCRACY

CAT AND I are going to keep this short and sweet.
   We wish one and all a wonderful holiday, Christmas included.
   And we want to say that we know what you’re going through.
   You’re wondering, as are we, how is Individual 1 going to ruin the holiday?
   Because this is the kind of day that sends Individual 1 right into orbit, because most people aren’t thinking about him.
    Depending on their belief system, people may be thinking about a certain newborn and all the attention he’s (or she’s) getting from wise men and shepherds, etc., down at the stable. But not so much the juvenile in the White House.
     And then there’s Fatty Claus, as Individual 1 might call him, because in the run up to the holiday, all sorts of tweets, texts, emails, Instagrams and even faxes (from old-fashioned traditionalists) are aimed at the North Pole and not the Oval Office.
   There are a lot of things that send Donald Trump into tantrum mode – women, black people, disabled people, generals who write long resignation letters, World War II allies, and journalists who haven’t been kidnapped and assassinated (yet). But the one thing he absolutely cannot abide is a time when he’s not the center of attention.
   So Christmas Day is a dangerous day.
   Will he fire Mueller first thing Christmas morning? Start a nuclear war? Issue a resume-torture order at Gitmo? Install a coal-burning furnace in the White House? Lock up immigrant children and send them and their folks back to certain death in their violent native countries? Oops, we forgot: been there, done that.
   So, friends, Cat and I are here to assure you that worrying about Individual 1 on Christmas Day is understandable, even patriotic.

BUT THIS IS A TIME truly of good will and of looking forward to a fresh start in the coming New Year.
   Let’s not ignore the positive things that happened in 2018. American democracy turned out to be resilient, with a remarkable election in which Democrats were elected in stunning numbers, so they’ll take firm control of the House. A lot of work went into that by hundreds of thousands of people, who overcame Americans’ historic apathy about politics, gerrymandered voting districts, laws that tried to keep people, especially minorities, from voting.
   That’s big. Balance partially restored to one of the three branches of government, coming in January to a country you can be proud of.
   Here’s another positive, and we think you’ll agree that it clinches our case in favor of reasonable optimism.

REMEMBER the horrible school and other shootings, and how, in particular, kids, students, teenagers, went on the rampage against guns. It had an effect.
   I’ll give you an example. Faithful readers of this blog might remember that last March, I (Phoebe) attended one version of the March for Our Lives, a national event marking the deaths of 17 people in Parkland, Florida on Valentine’s Day. It was in Middlebury, Vermont, and it drew a crowd of about 300, which is a lot for a smallish town of 8,500.
   Among the speakers was a high school girl who said that when she went to school, even though she was an ornery teenager, she actually kissed her mother goodbye on the chance that would be the last time she'd see her Mom before a gunman showed up during physics class.
   I was thinking, kind of moving, Kid – but a little over the top, because what are the chances of that happening in a cute little college town like Middlebury?
   Fast forward to Dec. 18, 2018. That was a day that police broke up a plan by two 14-year-olds to shoot at least one student and possibly others at, guess where: Middlebury Union Middle School.
   Two key events:
      One, a student told his or her parents there was talk of a potential shooting, and the parents called the cops. Very brave. Very smart. The kid is a hero.
   Secondly, following the March for Our Lives, Vermont Governor Phil Scott – a Republican in a gun-loving state (lots of hunting in liberal Vermont) – signed gun control legislation as a result of the concern about school shootings in general, and in particular, an earlier thwarted school shooting attempt at a different Vermont town.
   One of the new measures allowed authorities to take prompt action in Middlebury. Here’s how the town’s paper, the Addison Independent, reported it:
   It’s a case that … put into practice one of the key provisions of a much-debated gun safety law signed by Gov. Phil Scott this past spring. Middlebury police investigators successfully applied to a court official for an “extreme risk protection order” that allowed them to temporarily remove firearms from the home from which one of the youths was going to access guns to use in the planned shooting.
   Ten guns confiscated.
   Who knows how many school children and teachers spared?
   Just like the midterm elections may have been a turning point in reversing the disaster of the Trump presidency, the passion and caring that kids across America demonstrated made a difference: they spoke out, took action, changed laws and saved lives.
   There’s a lot to celebrate as we close out 2018.
   From Cat and me, Merry Christmas and stay positive. There’s much to look forward to in the New Year.

Day 679

12/6/2018

LET'S NOT IGNORE THE OBVIOUS

THE SIGNS ARE CLEAR: INDIVIDUAL 1 IS GETTING READY TO GET AWAY WITH IT

IF YOU'RE LIKE like Cat and me, the midterm elections brought enormous relief.
   For the first time since the one known in recent court documents as Individual 1 became president, we haven’t woken each morning terrified about what we’ll learn about the terrifying things he did or said overnight. And we haven’t had to prepare ourselves for the dreadful thing – several dreadful things – he’ll do during the day.
   Yup, we’re relaxed, calmer, dreamier. Cat has been managing two smiles a day. I’m increasingly able to complete a thought not afflicted, even subliminally by the number 1.
   We’re wrong, of course.
   The warning signs are everywhere.
   The worst Constitutional Crisis since the Civil War (don’t you love it when dogs use big-but-boring words like Constitutional?), as Individual 1 gets ready to make his biggest move so far to fire Bob Mueller, or in some way, stop, cripple or maim the investigation into Russian election trickery.
   “Impossible!” Cat exclaimed as I outlined the scenario. “The Democrats will control the House beginning next month. Mikey Flynn, Individual1’s former national security advisor, has been singing so loudly and long that Mueller is recommending no cage time for him. So lots of potential impeachment/ felony fodder there.
   "And people are catching on. Like at the George Bush funeral yesterday: Every time someone said something nice about the president in the casket, it was like they were pointing out another thing lacking in the living one crouched in an aisle seat, pouting," Cat said, then proclaiming, not that originally: "This national nightmare is about to be over!”
   “All the more reason for Individual 1 to make his move - and soon,” I said to Cat.
   “But impossible for him to get away with it,” Cat retorted. “It’s going to be Watergate déjà vu all over again. Next time we see Individual 1, he'll be doing the Nixon Wave from doorway of Marine One, just before the chopper whisks him out of the Oval Office and out of our lives.”
   “We don’t know that, Cat,” I said. “History doesn’t repeat itself, not exactly. What makes you think the Russia scandals will have that kind of an ending? What if 1 and his creepy fractions make the Mueller investigation go away, or Individual 1 issues pardons to every man, woman and child in the United States, just as a precautionary move?"

CAT DID WHAT he always does when faced with a complex and disagreeable problem, he curled up on a blanket on the living room couch and fell asleep. A few hours later, he opened one eye, and began purring so deeply that the whole house seemed to vibrate.
   “Individual 1is a coward, and he’s just not going to even try to fire enough people until he finds one who will help him make the investigation go away,” Cat said. “He won’t dare, period.”
   “You are ignoring the obvious,” I said. “Individual 1 may be a serial liar, but he’s pretty obvious about what’s on his mind, using the word loosely.”
   “For example?”
   “Not releasing his tax returns,” I said.
   “That is so yesterday,” Cat said. “We all lost interest in that a trillion headlines ago.”
   “But it’s also so obvious,” I said. “He’s hiding his tax returns because they have something damaging – like whether he’s in debt to the Russians, the Saudis or the International Dictators’ Monetary and Assistance Fund. But for sure, thar's gold in them thar returns.”
   “Why don’t I hear much about the tax returns?” Cat retorted. “The pundits hardly mention them.”
   “That’s because the pundits don’t like the obvious,” I said. “When things are obvious, you don’t need pundits to explain them. The obvious puts them out of business.”

“WHAT ELSE?” Cat asked.
   “He’s fired people already,” I said. “So, it’s not like he hasn’t practiced this.”
   “When Jim Comey was FBI director and indicated he wasn’t going to be ‘loyal’ – like going easy on Individual 1’s former national security advisor, Mikey Flynn, he fired him.”
   “Old news, again,” Cat said.
   “When Jeff Sessions ‘recused’ himself from the Russia investigation, Individual 1 ranted incessantly against the attorney general, who’d done every other mean thing that 1 had wanted him to, like being cruel to immigrants. Finally, Individual 1 forced Sessions to resign,” I said.
   “More old news,” Cat said.
   “But so obvious,” I said. “Without being in charge of the investigation, Sessions wasn’t in a position to screw it up or shut it down. Obvious also is that Individual 1 was on the edge of obstruction of justice."
   “Next?” Cat asked.
   “Session’s replacement,” I said. “Obviously, Individual 1 wouldn’t be choosing the FBI deputy director, Rod Rosenstein, who’d been overseeing the Mueller probe and letting Mueller go about his merry way and do whatever the $%$@! he pleases. So he picked Matt.”
   “Matt who?” Cat asked.
   “Matt who, exactly,” I said. “Matt Whitaker. “Most of us never heard of Matt before he became Instant Acting Director of FBI. But it took reporters about five minutes to discover he wouldn’t be most people’s Number 1 choice for AG.”
   “Matt ran unsuccessfully for Iowa state treasurer, and failed to win the GOP nomination for a U.S. Senate seat from Iowa. He served a few years as a U.S. attorney in Iowa. At one point, he was an advisor to a questionable business that was investigated by the Federal Trade Commission, then forced to close and pay a big fine. Last year, his Republican connections led to his being named Sessions’ chief of staff, and last month, Matt took over Sessions’ job. Et tu, Matteus?
   “So, besides being unqualified, what about the Matt Man appealed to Individual 1 as the right guy?" Cat asked.
   “Before he went to the Justice Department, Matt was a pundit, and apparently the country’s Number One TV viewer saw Matt saying negative things about the Mueller probe," I said.
"Like in 2017, Matt appeared as a “legal consultant” on a CNN program where the discussion turned to what might happen if Sessions wasn’t in the picture. Matt Whitaker laid out this possibility:
   “… I could see a scenario where Jeff Sessions is replaced, it would (be a) recess appointment and that attorney general doesn't fire Bob Mueller, but he just reduces his budget to so low that his investigations grinds to almost a halt.”
   “You can see the attraction,” I said. "Matt's a man with a plan."
   Cat was amazed and actually opened his other eye, which he’d kept closed all this time, in case I stopped talking and he could get back to sleep. Cat pawsed (Get it?) and then went all sentimental on me.
   “I still believe in Truth, Justice and the American Way," Cat said. “And before you know it, Individual 1, Individual 1, Jr. (Sometimes referred to as Individual ½), and Mrs.Individual 1 will be on Marine One, to be whisked away from the White House and out of our lives. With the only question being whether Mrs. 1 will be wearing her overcoat, the one with that question stenciled on the back: ‘I really don’t care. Do you?’ ”

“THAT'S CERTAINLY THE RIGHT question, Cat,” I said.
   Cat looked confused: “What’s the right question. It’s not obvious, at least to me.”
   “Look, Cat," I said. "It's obvious that the outcome ultimately doesn’t depend on Mueller, the courts or even a House full of Democrats."
   "What matters in a democracy," I pontificated, "is whether enough of us care enough."
   "Whether enough ordinary citizens, voters, undecideds really care,"
    "Care about what?" Cat asked, clearly exasperated. "What to you mean?"
    "I mean," I said, "Does a majority of Americans care whether or not we have a scoundrel for a president?”
   “Isn’t that obvious?” Cat said.

A "sweet dog" and a smart opossum consider a nation at risk.

The writers

PHOEBE, a "sweet dog" who came to Rhode Island in 2010 as a stray puppy from Missouri, was a political agnostic until Trump's catastrophic election. She tracked his presidency in a blog, which she decided to resurrect it this year when it became obvious that Republicans are committed to Trump's destructive policies

MR. O, an opossum, showed up in Phoebe's backyard somewhat mysteriously. He turned out to have genuine insight into political matters, and he agreed to assume co-author duties of the blog after Phoebe's previous writing partner, Cat, a cat, died.

CAT

Day 698

Holiday editionAT CHRISTMAS, CELEBRATING HOW THE NATION - AND ITS KIDS - DEFENDED DEMOCRACY

Day 679

LET'S NOT IGNORE THE OBVIOUS

The writers

Archives

Categories

Holiday edition
AT CHRISTMAS, CELEBRATING HOW THE NATION - AND ITS KIDS - DEFENDED DEMOCRACY